One of the most important developments in blockchain technology is the introduction of Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions. These solutions are designed to enhance blockchain networks’ scalability, efficiency, and overall functionality. 

These solutions address fundamental challenges blockchain networks face, such as scalability and processing speed, while ensuring the security and integrity of the systems remain intact. 

Why have two layers?

Layer 2 solutions are the direct response to congestion on blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. When these blockchains were being discussed prior to 2017, there was a strong emphasis on decentralization, anonymity, and trying to position the technology for mass adoption. 

Some discussion took place about scaling, but with Bitcoin and Ethereum's relatively low fiat cost, transaction costs were typically just a few pennies. People seemed more interested in faster confirmation times because Bitcoin transfers were considered slow. 

Litecoin was an exciting alternative, and many people saw the potential (and liquidity) of that network to move their coins between different exchanges. 

The rising price of Bitcoin and Ethereum brought increased transaction fees with it. Most people perceive Bitcoin’s value based on how much fiat currency is required to purchase it.

In 2013, the price to send a Bitcoin transaction was almost always less than $0.25. By 2017/2018, some days, it would be $10.00 or more. As of late January, the average cost is around $9.5 

This perfect storm of slow transaction times and high transaction fees provided fertile ground for new ideas. What if an individual could “lock up” their coins on a layer 1 blockchain and get issued a representation of those coins on a faster network that’s trustworthy? 

It’s almost like issuing paper currency that’s backed 100%, only it’s a digital token that represents Bitcoin. The idea is brilliant: a centralized layer that’s fast and trustworthy on top of a decentralized blockchain. Users of the centralized layer 2 network can simply square up later by converting their layer 2 coins for layer 1. 

This is how layer 2 networks became popular and why people use them. 

Layer 1 Solutions

Blockchain networks, in their native sense, are simply referred to by their name or called Layer 1 networks. This layer serves as the foundation of a blockchain and determines its inherent properties and capabilities. 

Layer 1 solutions primarily focus on enhancing the network within its original framework. For example, someone could refer to Qtum as simply “Qtum” or “Layer 1” within an article or discussion context. The meanings overlap. 

The most common Layer 1 solutions for scalability and performance include increasing the block size, changing the consensus mechanism, and implementing sharding. 

Increasing the block size allows more transactions to be processed at once, improving the network’s transaction processing capacity. 

Another Layer 1 approach involves changing the consensus mechanism, such as transitioning from Proof of Work (PoW) to Proof of Stake (PoS). 

This can enhance transaction speeds and reduce energy consumption. Ethereum’s upgrade to Ethereum 2.0 is an example of shifting from PoW to PoS to boost efficiency and scalability.

Sharding is another innovative Layer 1 solution. It involves breaking down the blockchain database into smaller, more manageable segments, allowing transactions to be processed simultaneously across different shards. 

This parallel processing capability significantly boosts the overall capacity and speed of the blockchain.

Examples of Layer 1 blockchains include Bitcoin, Ethereum, Qtum, and Cardano. Each platform has a unique architecture and has implemented various Layer 1 solutions to address specific challenges related to scalability and performance. 

Layer 2 Solutions

Blockchain networks use Layer 2 solutions to improve the speed and capacity of transactions without changing the underlying blockchain. 

These Layer 2 protocols provide additional processing capabilities that reduce the transactional pressure on the main chain. 

There are four types of Layer 2 solutions:

• Rollups combine multiple transactions into one and record them on Layer 1. This increases the number of transactions that can be processed at once.

• Side chains are separate blockchains that operate alongside the main chain and have their processing capabilities. This enables them to handle transactions independently and increase the overall transaction capacity of the network.

• State channels allow multiple transactions to occur off the main chain before recording only the final state of the transactions on the blockchain. This is useful when multiple transactions occur between the same parties.

• Nested blockchains delegate transaction processing to secondary chains, reducing the processing load on Layer 1.

Two examples of Layer 2 solutions are Bitcoin's Lightning Network, which creates payment channels between frequent users, and Ethereum's Polygon, which enhances the scalability and user experience of the Ethereum network.

The Blockchain Trilemma

The Blockchain Trilemma is a concept that explains the challenges of achieving scalability, security, and decentralization simultaneously in a blockchain network. 

It suggests that a blockchain can be good at only two of these three aspects at any given time.

Two types of solutions address this issue: Layer 1 and Layer 2. 

Layer 1 solutions focus on improving either decentralization or security. Sharding, for example, enhances scalability but may compromise security or decentralization. 

Layer 2 solutions improve scalability while maintaining the security and decentralization of the underlying Layer 1 blockchain. State channels, for instance, can improve scalability but depend on the security mechanisms of the main chain.

To balance the Trilemma, both Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions are needed. 

Layer 1 focuses on foundational improvements while maintaining security and decentralization. 

Layer 2 solutions offer more flexibility in scalability without heavily compromising the other two aspects. 

Comparing Layer 1 and Layer 2 Solutions

• Layer 1 solutions improve scalability by changing the blockchain's architecture. This takes time and agreement from the entire network. Layer 2 solutions offer quicker scalability improvements by using secondary networks. This approach can increase transaction capacity without major changes to the main chain.

• Layer 1 maintains a high level of security because changes are made directly to the underlying blockchain. Layer 2 aims to use the security of the underlying blockchain but may introduce new security considerations.

• Changes to Layer 1 can strengthen or weaken decentralization. Layer 2 often relies on fewer nodes for validation, which may centralize certain aspects of the transaction process.

• Layer 1 solutions are fundamental and offer long-term improvements but may be slow to implement and require broad consensus. Layer 2 solutions offer rapid scalability improvements but rely on Layer 1 for ultimate settlement and security.

Blockchain technology is constantly evolving, and the future of both Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions seems promising. 

The ongoing developments in both layers indicate a trend towards more harmonious integration, where Layer 2 solutions become more robust, and Layer 1 blockchains adopt scalability-friendly protocols.

Innovations such as cross-chain interoperability and advanced consensus mechanisms will likely shape the future landscape of Layer 1 and Layer 2 solutions. 

Join the Qtum Community

If you haven't already, we invite you to become a part of our community. Stay in tune with the latest developments, participate in discussions, and contribute to the growth of the Qtum ecosystem. Here are some places to connect with us:

Qtum Discord

Qtum Twitter